$$ \newcommand{\cis}{\operatorname{cis}} \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\left\|#1\right\|} \newcommand{\paren}[1]{\left(#1\right)} \newcommand{\sq}[1]{\left[#1\right]} \newcommand{\abs}[1]{\left\lvert#1\right\rvert} \newcommand{\set}[1]{\left\{#1\right\}} \newcommand{\ang}[1]{\left\langle#1\right\rangle} \newcommand{\floor}[1]{\left\lfloor#1\right\rfloor} \newcommand{\ceil}[1]{\left\lceil#1\right\rceil} \newcommand{\C}{\mathbb{C}} \newcommand{\D}{\mathbb{D}} \newcommand{\R}{\mathbb{R}} \newcommand{\Q}{\mathbb{Q}} \newcommand{\Z}{\mathbb{Z}} \newcommand{\N}{\mathbb{N}} \newcommand{\F}{\mathbb{F}} \newcommand{\T}{\mathbb{T}} \renewcommand{\S}{\mathbb{S}} \newcommand{\intr}{{\large\circ}} \newcommand{\limni}[1][n]{\lim_{#1\to\infty}} \renewcommand{\Re}{\operatorname{Re}} \renewcommand{\Im}{\operatorname{Im}} $$

Math 104 - Introduction to Analysis

Group presentation rubric

Presentation structure (group)—/10
Your group's presentation was a cohesive whole.10
Your group's presentation was somewhat disjointed, or meshed poorly between speakers, with some omitted or repeated material.5
Your group's presentation was not at all coordinated or felt like several completely independent talks.0
Presentation timing (group)—/10
Your group's presentation lasts roughly the correct time without being cut short.10
Your group's presentation ran somewhat over or under.5
Your group's presentation ran significantly long or short.0
Presentation content (group)—/10
Your group's presentation covered a topic related to the course that was both interesting and accessible to your peers. 10
Your group's presentation covered a topic related to the course, but was hard for your peers to understand. 5
Your group's presentation covered a topic unrelated to the course, or was missing so much background as to be incomprehensible to your peers. 0
Presentation format—/10
You led the presentation for at least 10 minutes, with a well-suited visual component. 10
You led the presentation for at least 7.5 minutes, or had a visual component which was hard to follow. 5
You did not lead a significant portion of the presentation or had an incomprehensible visual component, or you led for at least 7.5 minutes with a difficult-to-follow visual component. 0
Presentation content i—/30
Your presentation included appropriately complex content, inculding at least one complete proof or a non-trivial portion of a longer proof. 30
Your presentation covered material somewhat complex material, but omitted some important details or left all the critical steps to others. 20
Your presentation covered a simple topic, or included only straightforward proofs. 10
Your presentation covered a topic with little or no complexity and included no proofs. 0
Presentation content ii—/10
You presented well-motivated material placed within a larger mathematical context, and provided clear intuition. 10
Your presentation did not place itself within a larger picture, or was largely technical without offering intuition. 5
Your presentation provided neither mathematical context nor intuition. 0
Presentation quality—/30
You gave a clear and polished presentation that was well-paced and easy to follow. 30
Your presentation was clear and mostly polished, or paced somewhat too slow or too fast. 20
Your presentation was unclear or poorly paced, or did not seem rehearsed. 10
Your presentation was unclear and poorly paced. 0
Total—/110