| Report format | —/10 |
|---|---|
| Your paper was neatly typed with correct length and formatting. | 10 |
| Your paper was typed, but poorly presented or formatted. | 5 |
| Your paper was not typed or did not have the correct length. | 0 |
| Report content i | —/10 |
|---|---|
| Your paper included the preliminary material needed to understand it, including definitions and context. | 10 |
| Your paper included some preliminary material, but lacked some definitions or context. | 5 |
| Your paper was devoid of background material. | 0 |
| Report content ii | —/20 |
|---|---|
| Your paper included all the technical content of your presentation, including proofs and other details omitted from your talk. | 20 |
| Your paper included most of the material from your talk, but left out some important details or proofs. | 10 |
| Your paper skipped topics covered during your presentation, or did not provide suitable technical details. | 0 |
| Report content | —/10 |
|---|---|
| Your paper provided useful examples and intuition (or other appropriate guiding content) to aid the reader. | 10 |
| Your paper included some examples or intuition, but was mostly theorems and proofs. | 5 |
| Your paper included no examples nor guiding text. | 0 |
| Report quality | —/30 |
|---|---|
| Your paper was clearly written and demonstrated a strong grasp of the material. | 30 |
| Your paper was clearly written, but showed some confusion on a few aspects of the material. | 20 |
| Your paper was not clearly written, or showed a lack of understanding on many aspects of the material. | 10 |
| Your paper demonstrated a clear misunderstanding of most of the material, or contained blatent factual errors. | 0 |
| Total | —/80 |
|---|