$$ \newcommand{\cis}{\operatorname{cis}} \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\left\|#1\right\|} \newcommand{\paren}[1]{\left(#1\right)} \newcommand{\sq}[1]{\left[#1\right]} \newcommand{\abs}[1]{\left\lvert#1\right\rvert} \newcommand{\set}[1]{\left\{#1\right\}} \newcommand{\ang}[1]{\left\langle#1\right\rangle} \newcommand{\floor}[1]{\left\lfloor#1\right\rfloor} \newcommand{\ceil}[1]{\left\lceil#1\right\rceil} \newcommand{\C}{\mathbb{C}} \newcommand{\D}{\mathbb{D}} \newcommand{\R}{\mathbb{R}} \newcommand{\Q}{\mathbb{Q}} \newcommand{\Z}{\mathbb{Z}} \newcommand{\N}{\mathbb{N}} \newcommand{\F}{\mathbb{F}} \newcommand{\T}{\mathbb{T}} \renewcommand{\S}{\mathbb{S}} \newcommand{\intr}{{\large\circ}} \newcommand{\limni}[1][n]{\lim_{#1\to\infty}} \renewcommand{\Re}{\operatorname{Re}} \renewcommand{\Im}{\operatorname{Im}} $$

Math 104 - Introduction to Analysis

Report rubric

Report format—/10
Your paper was neatly typed with correct length and formatting. 10
Your paper was typed, but poorly presented or formatted. 5
Your paper was not typed or did not have the correct length. 0
Report content i—/10
Your paper included the preliminary material needed to understand it, including definitions and context. 10
Your paper included some preliminary material, but lacked some definitions or context. 5
Your paper was devoid of background material. 0
Report content ii—/20
Your paper included all the technical content of your presentation, including proofs and other details omitted from your talk. 20
Your paper included most of the material from your talk, but left out some important details or proofs. 10
Your paper skipped topics covered during your presentation, or did not provide suitable technical details. 0
Report content—/10
Your paper provided useful examples and intuition (or other appropriate guiding content) to aid the reader. 10
Your paper included some examples or intuition, but was mostly theorems and proofs. 5
Your paper included no examples nor guiding text. 0
Report quality—/30
Your paper was clearly written and demonstrated a strong grasp of the material. 30
Your paper was clearly written, but showed some confusion on a few aspects of the material. 20
Your paper was not clearly written, or showed a lack of understanding on many aspects of the material. 10
Your paper demonstrated a clear misunderstanding of most of the material, or contained blatent factual errors. 0
Total—/80