$$ \newcommand{\cis}{\operatorname{cis}} \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\left\|#1\right\|} \newcommand{\paren}[1]{\left(#1\right)} \newcommand{\sq}[1]{\left[#1\right]} \newcommand{\abs}[1]{\left\lvert#1\right\rvert} \newcommand{\set}[1]{\left\{#1\right\}} \newcommand{\ang}[1]{\left\langle#1\right\rangle} \newcommand{\floor}[1]{\left\lfloor#1\right\rfloor} \newcommand{\ceil}[1]{\left\lceil#1\right\rceil} \newcommand{\C}{\mathbb{C}} \newcommand{\D}{\mathbb{D}} \newcommand{\R}{\mathbb{R}} \newcommand{\Q}{\mathbb{Q}} \newcommand{\Z}{\mathbb{Z}} \newcommand{\N}{\mathbb{N}} \newcommand{\F}{\mathbb{F}} \newcommand{\T}{\mathbb{T}} \renewcommand{\S}{\mathbb{S}} \newcommand{\intr}{{\large\circ}} \newcommand{\limni}[1][n]{\lim_{#1\to\infty}} \renewcommand{\Re}{\operatorname{Re}} \renewcommand{\Im}{\operatorname{Im}} $$

Math 104 - Introduction to Analysis

Solo presentation rubric

Presentation structure—/10
Your presentation was laid out as a cohesive whole.10
Your presentation structure was reasonable but had some jarring transitions or confused flow.5
Your presentation jumped chaotically from idea to idea without indication of where it was headed.0
Presentation format—/10
Your presentation lasted roughly 20 minutes without being cut short, and has well-suited visual component.10
Your presentation ran 1.5-4 minutes over or under, or your visual component was difficult to follow or understand.5
Your presentation ran significantly long or short, or your visual component was incomprehensible.0
Presentation content i—/10
Your presentation covered a topic related to the course that was both interesting and accessible to your peers. 10
Your presentation covered a topic related to the course, but was hard for your peers to understand. 5
Your presentation covered a topic unrelated to the course, or was missing so much background as to be incomprehensible to your peers. 0
Presentation content ii—/30
Your presentation included appropriately complex content, inculding at least one complete proof. 30
Your presentation covered material somewhat complex material, but omitted some important details. 20
Your presentation covered a simple topic, or included only straightforward proofs. 10
Your presentation covered a topic with little or no complexity and included no proofs. 0
Presentation content iii—/10
You presented well-motivated material placed within a larger mathematical context, and provided clear intuition. 10
Your presentation did not place itself within a larger picture, or was largely technical without offering intuition. 5
Your presentation provided neither mathematical context nor intuition. 0
Presentation quality—/30
You gave a clear and polished presentation that was well-paced and easy to follow. 30
Your presentation was clear and mostly polished, or paced somewhat too slow or too fast. 20
Your presentation was unclear or poorly paced, or did not seem rehearsed. 10
Your presentation was unclear and poorly paced. 0
Total—/100